<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WebCore Rendering II - Blocks and Inlines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://webkit.org/blog/115/webcore-rendering-ii-blocks-and-inlines/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://webkit.org/blog/115/webcore-rendering-ii-blocks-and-inlines/</link>
	<description>All about WebKit development</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 12:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: hyatt</title>
		<link>http://webkit.org/blog/115/webcore-rendering-ii-blocks-and-inlines/#comment-22788</link>
		<dc:creator>hyatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 23:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webkit.org/blog/115/webcore-rendering-ii-blocks-and-inlines/#comment-22788</guid>
		<description>Longer term, I'd like to explore eliminating continuations completely and wrapping the offending blocks in an anonymous inline-block instead.  The difficult problem with using an anonymous inline-block, however, is that when the pre and post sections end up having no content, you have to margin collapse the offending blocks with surrounding content.  This would necessitate having a sort of hybrid line/block layout that could easily slide into and out of both layout modes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Longer term, I&#8217;d like to explore eliminating continuations completely and wrapping the offending blocks in an anonymous inline-block instead.  The difficult problem with using an anonymous inline-block, however, is that when the pre and post sections end up having no content, you have to margin collapse the offending blocks with surrounding content.  This would necessitate having a sort of hybrid line/block layout that could easily slide into and out of both layout modes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hyatt</title>
		<link>http://webkit.org/blog/115/webcore-rendering-ii-blocks-and-inlines/#comment-22787</link>
		<dc:creator>hyatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 23:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webkit.org/blog/115/webcore-rendering-ii-blocks-and-inlines/#comment-22787</guid>
		<description>Strictly speaking it isn't necessary, although it simplifies a lot of the code that deals with continuations.  It's basically there for convenience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Strictly speaking it isn&#8217;t necessary, although it simplifies a lot of the code that deals with continuations.  It&#8217;s basically there for convenience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Griego</title>
		<link>http://webkit.org/blog/115/webcore-rendering-ii-blocks-and-inlines/#comment-22786</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Griego</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 23:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webkit.org/blog/115/webcore-rendering-ii-blocks-and-inlines/#comment-22786</guid>
		<description>If the problem is having a block-level element within an inline element, then why is the anonymous middle block necessary?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the problem is having a block-level element within an inline element, then why is the anonymous middle block necessary?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
