WebKit GSoC Students Announced
Posted by Eric Seidel on Monday, April 21st, 2008 at 12:10 pmGoogle has released the list of students they will be sponsoring to work on WebKit as part of the Google Summer of Code this year. Congratulations to all of the students. We look forward to working with you closely this summer!
Thank you again to all the great students who applied! Unfortunately we had over twice as many applications as we had funding slots from Google. You’re certainly all welcome to come hack with us in #webkit any time.
April 21st, 2008 at 1:12 pm
[...] WebKit team announced the list of participants they’ll be working with on this year’s Google Summer of Code today. Of particular [...]
April 21st, 2008 at 1:27 pm
Congratulations to all participants!
April 21st, 2008 at 1:47 pm
Anyone know what projects the gsoc students are doing?
April 21st, 2008 at 1:55 pm
@jeffr: Follow the “list of students” link to see the list of students and their projects: http://code.google.com/soc/2008/webkit/about.html
April 22nd, 2008 at 2:01 am
Why does Mozilla have almost twice as many funding slots as WebKit?
April 22nd, 2008 at 5:48 am
Congratulations, I envy you
April 22nd, 2008 at 12:36 pm
The new work on JavaScriptCore, SquirrelFish, sounds very promising. Have you looked into using LLVM instead of writing the byte code interpreter yourselves? It should have byte code handling, execution and JIT already built-in..
I don’t know much about interpreters or compilers so I may be missing something obvious why it would not be suitable to WebKit
April 23rd, 2008 at 11:42 pm
@Jussi
We’ve certainly looked at LLVM (and other off-the-shelf JIT solutions) as a possible future direction. However, we don’t think its bytecode (which is very close to the machinel) would be very good for direct execution of JavaScript, which operates on fairly high level concepts. We are focusing on getting the core execution model as fast as possible before we try applying any JIT techniques.
April 24th, 2008 at 12:26 am
@Maciej
Thanks for the reply, I was quite sure you had looked into LLVM but wanted to give the heads up.