<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Announcing SquirrelFish</title>
	<atom:link href="http://webkit.org/blog/189/announcing-squirrelfish/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://webkit.org/blog/189/announcing-squirrelfish/</link>
	<description>All about WebKit development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 13:21:18 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Maya</title>
		<link>http://webkit.org/blog/189/announcing-squirrelfish/comment-page-2/#comment-24961</link>
		<dc:creator>Maya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 06:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webkit.org/blog/?p=189#comment-24961</guid>
		<description>The secret behind isn&#039;t LNVM, it&#039;s just Forth. It is the know how of this some people well known programming languge. If you hear about M. Anton Ertl and David Gregg, and about a very fast direct-threaded interpreted (may be byte code or not), it is clear,. it is Forth-know-how. I&#039;m absolutly sure.

Some Forth systems are the fastest threaded code and even direct-threaded code interpreter (als virtual stack machines) available. Know how coming from here speeds up SquirrelFish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The secret behind isn&#8217;t LNVM, it&#8217;s just Forth. It is the know how of this some people well known programming languge. If you hear about M. Anton Ertl and David Gregg, and about a very fast direct-threaded interpreted (may be byte code or not), it is clear,. it is Forth-know-how. I&#8217;m absolutly sure.</p>
<p>Some Forth systems are the fastest threaded code and even direct-threaded code interpreter (als virtual stack machines) available. Know how coming from here speeds up SquirrelFish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mcroft</title>
		<link>http://webkit.org/blog/189/announcing-squirrelfish/comment-page-2/#comment-24959</link>
		<dc:creator>mcroft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 17:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webkit.org/blog/?p=189#comment-24959</guid>
		<description>I got SunSpider 0.9 to run on MobileSafari 2.

Summary and comparison to WebKit post-SquirrelFish and IE7 on my 6 month old Thinkpad...
Totals:
iPhone: 148752.0ms +/- 3.9% 
WebKit: 2152.0ms +/- 1.7%
IE 7 : 35659.8ms +/- 3.4%

iPhone JavaScript is 4.17 times slower than IE7
iPhone Javascript is 69.1 times slower than WebKit Nightly
Internet Explorer 7 is 16.6 times slower than WebKit Nightly

&lt;a href=&quot;http://mcroft.livejournal.com/120458.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Detailed Results&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got SunSpider 0.9 to run on MobileSafari 2.</p>
<p>Summary and comparison to WebKit post-SquirrelFish and IE7 on my 6 month old Thinkpad&#8230;<br />
Totals:<br />
iPhone: 148752.0ms +/- 3.9%<br />
WebKit: 2152.0ms +/- 1.7%<br />
IE 7 : 35659.8ms +/- 3.4%</p>
<p>iPhone JavaScript is 4.17 times slower than IE7<br />
iPhone Javascript is 69.1 times slower than WebKit Nightly<br />
Internet Explorer 7 is 16.6 times slower than WebKit Nightly</p>
<p><a href="http://mcroft.livejournal.com/120458.html" rel="nofollow">Detailed Results</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Smith</title>
		<link>http://webkit.org/blog/189/announcing-squirrelfish/comment-page-2/#comment-24945</link>
		<dc:creator>David Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 22:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webkit.org/blog/?p=189#comment-24945</guid>
		<description>dicklacara: probably not. The compilation time is pretty minimal, and that would make it so that the bytecode format couldn&#039;t be upgraded in the future, which would make further performance gains harder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dicklacara: probably not. The compilation time is pretty minimal, and that would make it so that the bytecode format couldn&#8217;t be upgraded in the future, which would make further performance gains harder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dicklacara</title>
		<link>http://webkit.org/blog/189/announcing-squirrelfish/comment-page-2/#comment-24940</link>
		<dc:creator>dicklacara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 15:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webkit.org/blog/?p=189#comment-24940</guid>
		<description>Wouldn&#039;t there be a potentially large performance gain by:

1)  pre-compiling the bytecode on  the server
2)  serving the bytecode and byte code interpreter, only, to the client
3)  interpreting the bytecode on the client</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#8217;t there be a potentially large performance gain by:</p>
<p>1)  pre-compiling the bytecode on  the server<br />
2)  serving the bytecode and byte code interpreter, only, to the client<br />
3)  interpreting the bytecode on the client</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Podcast #11 - stackoverflow</title>
		<link>http://webkit.org/blog/189/announcing-squirrelfish/comment-page-2/#comment-24937</link>
		<dc:creator>Podcast #11 - stackoverflow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 00:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webkit.org/blog/?p=189#comment-24937</guid>
		<description>[...] excited about the SquirrelFish project, which promises to speed up plain old JavaScript running in the browser dramatically &#8212; 1.5 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] excited about the SquirrelFish project, which promises to speed up plain old JavaScript running in the browser dramatically &#8212; 1.5 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brunobl</title>
		<link>http://webkit.org/blog/189/announcing-squirrelfish/comment-page-2/#comment-24930</link>
		<dc:creator>brunobl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 10:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webkit.org/blog/?p=189#comment-24930</guid>
		<description>It would be great to also work on memory leaks :-)
http://dotnetperls.com/Content/Browser-Memory.aspx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be great to also work on memory leaks <img src='http://webkit.org/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
<a href="http://dotnetperls.com/Content/Browser-Memory.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://dotnetperls.com/Content/Browser-Memory.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arley23</title>
		<link>http://webkit.org/blog/189/announcing-squirrelfish/comment-page-2/#comment-24929</link>
		<dc:creator>Arley23</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 03:19:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webkit.org/blog/?p=189#comment-24929</guid>
		<description>Is it just me or has Webkit for Windows hasn&#039;t worked since June 09???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it just me or has Webkit for Windows hasn&#8217;t worked since June 09???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ten Big New Features in Mac OS X Snow Leopard &#8212; RoughlyDrafted Magazine</title>
		<link>http://webkit.org/blog/189/announcing-squirrelfish/comment-page-2/#comment-24917</link>
		<dc:creator>Ten Big New Features in Mac OS X Snow Leopard &#8212; RoughlyDrafted Magazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 10:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webkit.org/blog/?p=189#comment-24917</guid>
		<description>[...] Leopard Wish List: 2005 How Open will the iPhone Get? Surfin’ Safari » Announcing SquirrelFish Microsoft&#8217;s Application Features in Mac OS X, System Wide. Microsoft&#8217;s business model [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Leopard Wish List: 2005 How Open will the iPhone Get? Surfin’ Safari » Announcing SquirrelFish Microsoft&#8217;s Application Features in Mac OS X, System Wide. Microsoft&#8217;s business model [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Macworld &#124; WebApps i Safari 4 eller Fluid</title>
		<link>http://webkit.org/blog/189/announcing-squirrelfish/comment-page-2/#comment-24915</link>
		<dc:creator>Macworld &#124; WebApps i Safari 4 eller Fluid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 06:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webkit.org/blog/?p=189#comment-24915</guid>
		<description>[...] Safari 4. Safari 4 vil også muligens få gleden av en helt ny JavaScript interpretor med kodenavn SquirrelFish. Når dette implementeres er avhengig av utviklingsprogresjonen, men tester så langt viser gode [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Safari 4. Safari 4 vil også muligens få gleden av en helt ny JavaScript interpretor med kodenavn SquirrelFish. Når dette implementeres er avhengig av utviklingsprogresjonen, men tester så langt viser gode [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: incompl.com &#187; June Link Dump</title>
		<link>http://webkit.org/blog/189/announcing-squirrelfish/comment-page-2/#comment-24906</link>
		<dc:creator>incompl.com &#187; June Link Dump</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 17:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webkit.org/blog/?p=189#comment-24906</guid>
		<description>[...] SquirrelFish. Everyone should look to these folks next time they need inspiration for naming their JavaScript interpreter. And the logo? Spectacular. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] SquirrelFish. Everyone should look to these folks next time they need inspiration for naming their JavaScript interpreter. And the logo? Spectacular. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
