<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Announcing SquirrelFish</title>
	<atom:link href="http://webkit.org/blog/189/announcing-squirrelfish/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://webkit.org/blog/189/announcing-squirrelfish/</link>
	<description>All about WebKit development</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 09:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Maya</title>
		<link>http://webkit.org/blog/189/announcing-squirrelfish/#comment-24961</link>
		<dc:creator>Maya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 06:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webkit.org/blog/?p=189#comment-24961</guid>
		<description>The secret behind isn't LNVM, it's just Forth. It is the know how of this some people well known programming languge. If you hear about M. Anton Ertl and David Gregg, and about a very fast direct-threaded interpreted (may be byte code or not), it is clear,. it is Forth-know-how. I'm absolutly sure.

Some Forth systems are the fastest threaded code and even direct-threaded code interpreter (als virtual stack machines) available. Know how coming from here speeds up SquirrelFish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The secret behind isn&#8217;t LNVM, it&#8217;s just Forth. It is the know how of this some people well known programming languge. If you hear about M. Anton Ertl and David Gregg, and about a very fast direct-threaded interpreted (may be byte code or not), it is clear,. it is Forth-know-how. I&#8217;m absolutly sure.</p>
<p>Some Forth systems are the fastest threaded code and even direct-threaded code interpreter (als virtual stack machines) available. Know how coming from here speeds up SquirrelFish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mcroft</title>
		<link>http://webkit.org/blog/189/announcing-squirrelfish/#comment-24959</link>
		<dc:creator>mcroft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 17:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webkit.org/blog/?p=189#comment-24959</guid>
		<description>I got SunSpider 0.9 to run on MobileSafari 2.

Summary and comparison to WebKit post-SquirrelFish and IE7 on my 6 month old Thinkpad...
Totals:
iPhone: 148752.0ms +/- 3.9% 
WebKit: 2152.0ms +/- 1.7%
IE 7 : 35659.8ms +/- 3.4%

iPhone JavaScript is 4.17 times slower than IE7
iPhone Javascript is 69.1 times slower than WebKit Nightly
Internet Explorer 7 is 16.6 times slower than WebKit Nightly

&lt;a href="http://mcroft.livejournal.com/120458.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Detailed Results&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got SunSpider 0.9 to run on MobileSafari 2.</p>
<p>Summary and comparison to WebKit post-SquirrelFish and IE7 on my 6 month old Thinkpad&#8230;<br />
Totals:<br />
iPhone: 148752.0ms +/- 3.9%<br />
WebKit: 2152.0ms +/- 1.7%<br />
IE 7 : 35659.8ms +/- 3.4%</p>
<p>iPhone JavaScript is 4.17 times slower than IE7<br />
iPhone Javascript is 69.1 times slower than WebKit Nightly<br />
Internet Explorer 7 is 16.6 times slower than WebKit Nightly</p>
<p><a href="http://mcroft.livejournal.com/120458.html" rel="nofollow">Detailed Results</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Smith</title>
		<link>http://webkit.org/blog/189/announcing-squirrelfish/#comment-24945</link>
		<dc:creator>David Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 22:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webkit.org/blog/?p=189#comment-24945</guid>
		<description>dicklacara: probably not. The compilation time is pretty minimal, and that would make it so that the bytecode format couldn't be upgraded in the future, which would make further performance gains harder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dicklacara: probably not. The compilation time is pretty minimal, and that would make it so that the bytecode format couldn&#8217;t be upgraded in the future, which would make further performance gains harder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dicklacara</title>
		<link>http://webkit.org/blog/189/announcing-squirrelfish/#comment-24940</link>
		<dc:creator>dicklacara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 15:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webkit.org/blog/?p=189#comment-24940</guid>
		<description>Wouldn't there be a potentially large performance gain by:

1)  pre-compiling the bytecode on  the server
2)  serving the bytecode and byte code interpreter, only, to the client
3)  interpreting the bytecode on the client</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#8217;t there be a potentially large performance gain by:</p>
<p>1)  pre-compiling the bytecode on  the server<br />
2)  serving the bytecode and byte code interpreter, only, to the client<br />
3)  interpreting the bytecode on the client</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Podcast #11 - stackoverflow</title>
		<link>http://webkit.org/blog/189/announcing-squirrelfish/#comment-24937</link>
		<dc:creator>Podcast #11 - stackoverflow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 00:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webkit.org/blog/?p=189#comment-24937</guid>
		<description>[...] excited about the SquirrelFish project, which promises to speed up plain old JavaScript running in the browser dramatically &#8212; 1.5 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] excited about the SquirrelFish project, which promises to speed up plain old JavaScript running in the browser dramatically &#8212; 1.5 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brunobl</title>
		<link>http://webkit.org/blog/189/announcing-squirrelfish/#comment-24930</link>
		<dc:creator>brunobl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 10:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webkit.org/blog/?p=189#comment-24930</guid>
		<description>It would be great to also work on memory leaks :-)
http://dotnetperls.com/Content/Browser-Memory.aspx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be great to also work on memory leaks <img src='http://webkit.org/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
<a href="http://dotnetperls.com/Content/Browser-Memory.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://dotnetperls.com/Content/Browser-Memory.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arley23</title>
		<link>http://webkit.org/blog/189/announcing-squirrelfish/#comment-24929</link>
		<dc:creator>Arley23</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 03:19:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webkit.org/blog/?p=189#comment-24929</guid>
		<description>Is it just me or has Webkit for Windows hasn't worked since June 09???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it just me or has Webkit for Windows hasn&#8217;t worked since June 09???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ten Big New Features in Mac OS X Snow Leopard &#8212; RoughlyDrafted Magazine</title>
		<link>http://webkit.org/blog/189/announcing-squirrelfish/#comment-24917</link>
		<dc:creator>Ten Big New Features in Mac OS X Snow Leopard &#8212; RoughlyDrafted Magazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 10:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webkit.org/blog/?p=189#comment-24917</guid>
		<description>[...] Leopard Wish List: 2005 How Open will the iPhone Get? Surfin’ Safari » Announcing SquirrelFish Microsoft&#8217;s Application Features in Mac OS X, System Wide. Microsoft&#8217;s business model [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Leopard Wish List: 2005 How Open will the iPhone Get? Surfin’ Safari » Announcing SquirrelFish Microsoft&#8217;s Application Features in Mac OS X, System Wide. Microsoft&#8217;s business model [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Macworld &#124; WebApps i Safari 4 eller Fluid</title>
		<link>http://webkit.org/blog/189/announcing-squirrelfish/#comment-24915</link>
		<dc:creator>Macworld &#124; WebApps i Safari 4 eller Fluid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 06:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webkit.org/blog/?p=189#comment-24915</guid>
		<description>[...] Safari 4. Safari 4 vil også muligens få gleden av en helt ny JavaScript interpretor med kodenavn SquirrelFish. Når dette implementeres er avhengig av utviklingsprogresjonen, men tester så langt viser gode [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Safari 4. Safari 4 vil også muligens få gleden av en helt ny JavaScript interpretor med kodenavn SquirrelFish. Når dette implementeres er avhengig av utviklingsprogresjonen, men tester så langt viser gode [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: incompl.com &#187; June Link Dump</title>
		<link>http://webkit.org/blog/189/announcing-squirrelfish/#comment-24906</link>
		<dc:creator>incompl.com &#187; June Link Dump</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 17:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webkit.org/blog/?p=189#comment-24906</guid>
		<description>[...] SquirrelFish. Everyone should look to these folks next time they need inspiration for naming their JavaScript interpreter. And the logo? Spectacular. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] SquirrelFish. Everyone should look to these folks next time they need inspiration for naming their JavaScript interpreter. And the logo? Spectacular. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
