<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Understanding HTML, XML and XHTML</title>
	<atom:link href="http://webkit.org/blog/68/understanding-html-xml-and-xhtml/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://webkit.org/blog/68/understanding-html-xml-and-xhtml/</link>
	<description>All about WebKit development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:00:28 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: soeren says &#187; Blog Archive &#187; XHTML remains a mess</title>
		<link>http://webkit.org/blog/68/understanding-html-xml-and-xhtml/comment-page-2/#comment-22821</link>
		<dc:creator>soeren says &#187; Blog Archive &#187; XHTML remains a mess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 15:20:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webkit.org/blog/?p=68#comment-22821</guid>
		<description>[...] just isn&#8217;t any good, and pretending it doesn&#8217;t exist isn&#8217;t a good idea. (Go read this, too, particularly the section with &#8220;You have a couple of choices:&#8221;.) Rather, the answer (to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] just isn&#8217;t any good, and pretending it doesn&#8217;t exist isn&#8217;t a good idea. (Go read this, too, particularly the section with &#8220;You have a couple of choices:&#8221;.) Rather, the answer (to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ColorThreads &#187; Blog Archive &#187; XHTML Safari Bug</title>
		<link>http://webkit.org/blog/68/understanding-html-xml-and-xhtml/comment-page-2/#comment-22518</link>
		<dc:creator>ColorThreads &#187; Blog Archive &#187; XHTML Safari Bug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 00:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webkit.org/blog/?p=68#comment-22518</guid>
		<description>[...] I knew that IE 6 doesn&#8217;t accept application/xhmlt+xml content type, which is needed for real XHTML, but that wasn&#8217;t the problem for me. I&#8217;ve created a simple test to see whether browsers [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I knew that IE 6 doesn&#8217;t accept application/xhmlt+xml content type, which is needed for real XHTML, but that wasn&#8217;t the problem for me. I&#8217;ve created a simple test to see whether browsers [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bad Web 2.0 - Helsinki cycling journey planner &#171; &#8220;Tech IT Easy&#8221; - Jeremy Fain&#8217;s blog</title>
		<link>http://webkit.org/blog/68/understanding-html-xml-and-xhtml/comment-page-2/#comment-21365</link>
		<dc:creator>Bad Web 2.0 - Helsinki cycling journey planner &#171; &#8220;Tech IT Easy&#8221; - Jeremy Fain&#8217;s blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 07:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webkit.org/blog/?p=68#comment-21365</guid>
		<description>[...] re so many things wrong in trying to publish something on the internet as XHTML Strict and serving it as text/html that it warrants it&#8217;s own article. What is worse, if y [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] re so many things wrong in trying to publish something on the internet as XHTML Strict and serving it as text/html that it warrants it&#8217;s own article. What is worse, if y [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe&#8217;s Robot-like Adventures  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; Switching back to HTML4</title>
		<link>http://webkit.org/blog/68/understanding-html-xml-and-xhtml/comment-page-2/#comment-20329</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe&#8217;s Robot-like Adventures  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; Switching back to HTML4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 20:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webkit.org/blog/?p=68#comment-20329</guid>
		<description>[...] ation for the possible standardization of the WHATWG proposal for HTML5 and because of the recommendation on the Surfin&#8217; Safari Weblog.  Also I&#8217;ve learned that my carefully crafted XHTML 1.1 is b [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ation for the possible standardization of the WHATWG proposal for HTML5 and because of the recommendation on the Surfin&#8217; Safari Weblog.  Also I&#8217;ve learned that my carefully crafted XHTML 1.1 is b [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web Development  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; Why you should be using HTML 4.01 instead of XHTML</title>
		<link>http://webkit.org/blog/68/understanding-html-xml-and-xhtml/comment-page-2/#comment-19816</link>
		<dc:creator>Web Development  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; Why you should be using HTML 4.01 instead of XHTML</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 19:25:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webkit.org/blog/?p=68#comment-19816</guid>
		<description>[...] g valid HTML 4.01 as text/html ensures the widest browser and search engine support.&quot; Apple (Safari): &quot;On today&#8217;s web, the best thing to do is to make your document HTML4 all [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] g valid HTML 4.01 as text/html ensures the widest browser and search engine support.&quot; Apple (Safari): &quot;On today&#8217;s web, the best thing to do is to make your document HTML4 all [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: holotone.net</title>
		<link>http://webkit.org/blog/68/understanding-html-xml-and-xhtml/comment-page-2/#comment-19612</link>
		<dc:creator>holotone.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 01:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webkit.org/blog/?p=68#comment-19612</guid>
		<description>[...] ground! YouTube - Kill -9 - You thought the seven layer model referred to a burrito&#8230; Surfin’ Safari - Blog Archive » Understanding HTML, XML and XHTML - OR, Close your &lt;script&gt; and &lt;canvas&amp; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ground! YouTube &#8211; Kill -9 &#8211; You thought the seven layer model referred to a burrito&#8230; Surfin’ Safari &#8211; Blog Archive » Understanding HTML, XML and XHTML &#8211; OR, Close your &lt;script&gt; and &lt;canvas&amp; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tech Center Current  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; Who says XHTML is good to use?</title>
		<link>http://webkit.org/blog/68/understanding-html-xml-and-xhtml/comment-page-2/#comment-19206</link>
		<dc:creator>Tech Center Current  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; Who says XHTML is good to use?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 16:51:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webkit.org/blog/?p=68#comment-19206</guid>
		<description>[...] s the widest browser and search engine support.  The Safari development team posted on its official blog:  On today&#8217;s web, the best thing to do is to make your document HTML4 all the way. Full XHTML pr [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] s the widest browser and search engine support.  The Safari development team posted on its official blog:  On today&#8217;s web, the best thing to do is to make your document HTML4 all the way. Full XHTML pr [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Rowe</title>
		<link>http://webkit.org/blog/68/understanding-html-xml-and-xhtml/comment-page-2/#comment-18897</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Rowe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 13:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webkit.org/blog/?p=68#comment-18897</guid>
		<description>Nuwendoorn: the theory is that search engines deal with your content better if you use &lt;em&gt;semantic&lt;/em&gt; markup, not XML vs HTML.  In my experience, it can be a big benefit compared to using table-laden non-semantic markup.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nuwendoorn: the theory is that search engines deal with your content better if you use <em>semantic</em> markup, not XML vs HTML.  In my experience, it can be a big benefit compared to using table-laden non-semantic markup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nuwendoorn</title>
		<link>http://webkit.org/blog/68/understanding-html-xml-and-xhtml/comment-page-2/#comment-18895</link>
		<dc:creator>Nuwendoorn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 09:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webkit.org/blog/?p=68#comment-18895</guid>
		<description>In some books I read that search engines are better updated when a site is built in XML than HTML.  My question is whether this is really true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In some books I read that search engines are better updated when a site is built in XML than HTML.  My question is whether this is really true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dunix</title>
		<link>http://webkit.org/blog/68/understanding-html-xml-and-xhtml/comment-page-2/#comment-18590</link>
		<dc:creator>dunix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 14:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webkit.org/blog/?p=68#comment-18590</guid>
		<description>they should make it one language with different ways of styling, instead of making a mess with all these little different names.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>they should make it one language with different ways of styling, instead of making a mess with all these little different names.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
