Comments on: HTML Standards Process Returning from the Grave http://webkit.org/blog/89/html-standards-process-returning-from-the-grave/ All about WebKit development Fri, 25 Jul 2008 06:32:02 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 By: Is XHTML good enought? | HTML-Advisor http://webkit.org/blog/89/html-standards-process-returning-from-the-grave/#comment-22760 Is XHTML good enought? | HTML-Advisor Sun, 29 Jul 2007 22:14:05 +0000 http://webkit.org/blog/?p=89#comment-22760 [...] of HTML 5 and have largely ignored the development of XHTML 2. The Safari development team has even opted to take no part in the XHTML 2 development [...] [...] of HTML 5 and have largely ignored the development of XHTML 2. The Safari development team has even opted to take no part in the XHTML 2 development [...]

]]> By: v9designbuild http://webkit.org/blog/89/html-standards-process-returning-from-the-grave/#comment-22638 v9designbuild Fri, 06 Jul 2007 12:47:23 +0000 http://webkit.org/blog/?p=89#comment-22638 I agree that the the 10% market share threshold may be off balance but some level does need to be established. I agree that giving the two major vendors the power of veto will disallow other browsers to be considered is not in the best interests of the industry. But if you lower it too far there is going to be a loss of integrity. Where is the happy medium? I agree that the the 10% market share threshold may be off balance but some level does need to be established. I agree that giving the two major vendors the power of veto will disallow other browsers to be considered is not in the best interests of the industry. But if you lower it too far there is going to be a loss of integrity. Where is the happy medium?

]]> By: Hixie's Natural Log: The CSS working group is irrelevant http://webkit.org/blog/89/html-standards-process-returning-from-the-grave/#comment-22298 Hixie's Natural Log: The CSS working group is irrelevant Wed, 06 Jun 2007 08:21:33 +0000 http://webkit.org/blog/?p=89#comment-22298 [...] At the time, we were just starting with the HTML working group, and the openness of the WHATWG over the past few years was just starting to be adopted by the HTML working group, after several months of pushing for it in the W3C (mostly in secret, though my own posts on the matter were all public, as were a few others). [...] [...] At the time, we were just starting with the HTML working group, and the openness of the WHATWG over the past few years was just starting to be adopted by the HTML working group, after several months of pushing for it in the W3C (mostly in secret, though my own posts on the matter were all public, as were a few others). [...]

]]> By: W3EDGE http://webkit.org/blog/89/html-standards-process-returning-from-the-grave/#comment-21444 W3EDGE Sat, 19 May 2007 16:24:31 +0000 http://webkit.org/blog/?p=89#comment-21444 I'm sorry to take it back to the beginning of the discussion here, (speaking to what Nicholas Shanks said), but I'd really like to know if and how delegation could be used to compartmentalize the tasks involved in finalizing a specification. It seems to me that there are plenty of qualified and talented minds willing to contribute, but so far (and excuse my ignorance), I cannot seem to find more than open discussions which tend to get a bit off topic. I’m sorry to take it back to the beginning of the discussion here, (speaking to what Nicholas Shanks said), but I’d really like to know if and how delegation could be used to compartmentalize the tasks involved in finalizing a specification. It seems to me that there are plenty of qualified and talented minds willing to contribute, but so far (and excuse my ignorance), I cannot seem to find more than open discussions which tend to get a bit off topic.

]]> By: urang a.k.a Saiful Adnan | HTML5, XHTML2, and the Future of the Web http://webkit.org/blog/89/html-standards-process-returning-from-the-grave/#comment-20259 urang a.k.a Saiful Adnan | HTML5, XHTML2, and the Future of the Web Sun, 22 Apr 2007 12:28:58 +0000 http://webkit.org/blog/?p=89#comment-20259 [...] major browser vendors supports XHTML2, and Apple’s Maciej Stachowiak even went so far as stating: We declined to participate in the XHTML2 Working Group because we [...] [...] major browser vendors supports XHTML2, and Apple’s Maciej Stachowiak even went so far as stating: We declined to participate in the XHTML2 Working Group because we [...]

]]> By: Make a Dream to be true… » HTML5, XHTML2, and the Future of the Web http://webkit.org/blog/89/html-standards-process-returning-from-the-grave/#comment-19771 Make a Dream to be true… » HTML5, XHTML2, and the Future of the Web Sat, 14 Apr 2007 21:44:16 +0000 http://webkit.org/blog/?p=89#comment-19771 [...] major browser vendors supports XHTML2, and Apple’s Maciej Stachowiak even went so far as stating: We declined to participate in the XHTML2 Working Group because we [...] [...] major browser vendors supports XHTML2, and Apple’s Maciej Stachowiak even went so far as stating: We declined to participate in the XHTML2 Working Group because we [...]

]]> By: Toronto’s Leading Web Designers » News Archive » HTML5, XHTML2, and the Future of the Web http://webkit.org/blog/89/html-standards-process-returning-from-the-grave/#comment-19750 Toronto’s Leading Web Designers » News Archive » HTML5, XHTML2, and the Future of the Web Fri, 13 Apr 2007 13:25:40 +0000 http://webkit.org/blog/?p=89#comment-19750 [...] major browser vendors supports XHTML2, and Apple’s Maciej Stachowiak even went so far as stating: We declined to participate in the XHTML2 Working Group because we [...] [...] major browser vendors supports XHTML2, and Apple’s Maciej Stachowiak even went so far as stating: We declined to participate in the XHTML2 Working Group because we [...]

]]> By:   HTML5, XHTML2, and the Future of the Web by .: Jnbn :. http://webkit.org/blog/89/html-standards-process-returning-from-the-grave/#comment-19749   HTML5, XHTML2, and the Future of the Web by .: Jnbn :. Fri, 13 Apr 2007 11:48:23 +0000 http://webkit.org/blog/?p=89#comment-19749 [...] major browser vendors supports XHTML2, and Apple’s Maciej Stachowiak even went so far as stating: We declined to participate in the XHTML2 Working Group because we [...] [...] major browser vendors supports XHTML2, and Apple’s Maciej Stachowiak even went so far as stating: We declined to participate in the XHTML2 Working Group because we [...]

]]> By: sebnewyork http://webkit.org/blog/89/html-standards-process-returning-from-the-grave/#comment-19723 sebnewyork Wed, 11 Apr 2007 18:29:21 +0000 http://webkit.org/blog/?p=89#comment-19723 This might be a naive question, however I would love to get an knowledgeable answer to it, I've kept wondering about it since I first started being a web-designer-developer: Why can't any content be fetched to an html page the same way an image can? for example: img src="image.jpg" ... text src="file.txt (or file.html, etc.) just like an include... for remote content text src="http://example.com/page.html/" tagId="someID" or by extension any content-type src="url" ... It seems to me that it would open enormous possibility Has it been thought out when HTML was conceived? If not why? This might be a naive question, however I would love to get an knowledgeable answer to it, I’ve kept wondering about it since I first started being a web-designer-developer:
Why can’t any content be fetched to an html page the same way an image can?
for example:
img src=”image.jpg” …
text src=”file.txt (or file.html, etc.) just like an include…
for remote content
text src=”http://example.com/page.html/” tagId=”someID”
or by extension any
content-type src=”url” …
It seems to me that it would open enormous possibility

Has it been thought out when HTML was conceived? If not why?

]]> By: the future of the web at jimmah ./write http://webkit.org/blog/89/html-standards-process-returning-from-the-grave/#comment-19713 the future of the web at jimmah ./write Wed, 11 Apr 2007 08:47:35 +0000 http://webkit.org/blog/?p=89#comment-19713 [...] major browser vendors supports XHTML2, and Apple’s Maciej Stachowiak even went so far as [...] [...] major browser vendors supports XHTML2, and Apple’s Maciej Stachowiak even went so far as [...]

]]>