<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Amusing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://webkit.org/blog/94/amusing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://webkit.org/blog/94/amusing/</link>
	<description>All about WebKit development</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 06:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stopped Clock Blog</title>
		<link>http://webkit.org/blog/94/amusing/#comment-22658</link>
		<dc:creator>Stopped Clock Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 20:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webkit.org/blog/?p=94#comment-22658</guid>
		<description>[...] Be careful about trusting user feedback. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Be careful about trusting user feedback. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AppleMania.info  » Arquivo   &#187; Conheça 52 dicas para tornar o Mac OS X mais rápido</title>
		<link>http://webkit.org/blog/94/amusing/#comment-21274</link>
		<dc:creator>AppleMania.info  » Arquivo   &#187; Conheça 52 dicas para tornar o Mac OS X mais rápido</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 09:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webkit.org/blog/?p=94#comment-21274</guid>
		<description>[...] etitivos.&#8221; Reduzir o tempo de atraso em páginas carregadas no Safari &#8212; &#8220;Não faz absolutamente nenhum efeito&#8220; &#160;OnyX &#8212; utilitário similar ao Tinkerto [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] etitivos.&#8221; Reduzir o tempo de atraso em páginas carregadas no Safari &#8212; &#8220;Não faz absolutamente nenhum efeito&#8220; &nbsp;OnyX &#8212; utilitário similar ao Tinkerto [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jed</title>
		<link>http://webkit.org/blog/94/amusing/#comment-19069</link>
		<dc:creator>jed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 01:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webkit.org/blog/?p=94#comment-19069</guid>
		<description>gavza says "not sure what joseintendo is moaning about.  Joseintendo says the link takes about 10 seconds to load, but 30-40 before it's done.  I wish I got that kind of performance.  Safari on a MacBook Pro is SLOOOW.  I also have a dual-boot PC with Firefox under Windows XP and/or Linux.  They are quite snappy, no loading delays there.  The Mac sucks on response time.  Yet, both machines are running off the same wireless router.  So what's the difference?  Firefox on the Mac doesn't seem any better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gavza says &#8220;not sure what joseintendo is moaning about.  Joseintendo says the link takes about 10 seconds to load, but 30-40 before it&#8217;s done.  I wish I got that kind of performance.  Safari on a MacBook Pro is SLOOOW.  I also have a dual-boot PC with Firefox under Windows XP and/or Linux.  They are quite snappy, no loading delays there.  The Mac sucks on response time.  Yet, both machines are running off the same wireless router.  So what&#8217;s the difference?  Firefox on the Mac doesn&#8217;t seem any better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dot unplanned &#187; Heh</title>
		<link>http://webkit.org/blog/94/amusing/#comment-18504</link>
		<dc:creator>dot unplanned &#187; Heh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 22:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webkit.org/blog/?p=94#comment-18504</guid>
		<description>[...] 		 		 	 			Heh 			 			  			March 2, 2007    			&#183; Filed under software						 		 			 			Surfin&#8217; Safari:     I just saw this article on Digg about how to &#8220;speed up Safari&#8221; by red [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 		 		 	 			Heh 			 			  			March 2, 2007    			&#183; Filed under software						 		 			 			Surfin&#8217; Safari:     I just saw this article on Digg about how to &#8220;speed up Safari&#8221; by red [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RapidMac  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; Safari Speedup Tip: Doesn&#8217;t Work</title>
		<link>http://webkit.org/blog/94/amusing/#comment-18416</link>
		<dc:creator>RapidMac  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; Safari Speedup Tip: Doesn&#8217;t Work</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 20:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webkit.org/blog/?p=94#comment-18416</guid>
		<description>[...] p the page loading in Safari, I&#8217;ve got an interesting fact for you. According to the WebKit.org blog, the preference the program is supposed to be modifying has been disable [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] p the page loading in Safari, I&#8217;ve got an interesting fact for you. According to the WebKit.org blog, the preference the program is supposed to be modifying has been disable [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Coffee Break &#183; How to Make Safari (at least) 200% faster</title>
		<link>http://webkit.org/blog/94/amusing/#comment-18387</link>
		<dc:creator>The Coffee Break &#183; How to Make Safari (at least) 200% faster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 21:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webkit.org/blog/?p=94#comment-18387</guid>
		<description>[...] 	February 25, 2007 in Fits Nowhere Else 		 		 			I found the following short notice on the WebKit blog to be very entertaining:     I just saw this article on Digg about how to “speed up Safari” by reduc [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 	February 25, 2007 in Fits Nowhere Else 		 		 			I found the following short notice on the WebKit blog to be very entertaining:     I just saw this article on Digg about how to “speed up Safari” by reduc [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adele</title>
		<link>http://webkit.org/blog/94/amusing/#comment-18242</link>
		<dc:creator>adele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 01:09:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webkit.org/blog/?p=94#comment-18242</guid>
		<description>josenintendo, this would be really great info to have in a bug report.

http://webkit.org/quality/reporting.html

If you could get a sample of Safari when its beachballing, that would be great too.

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>josenintendo, this would be really great info to have in a bug report.</p>
<p><a href="http://webkit.org/quality/reporting.html" rel="nofollow">http://webkit.org/quality/reporting.html</a></p>
<p>If you could get a sample of Safari when its beachballing, that would be great too.</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: josenintendo</title>
		<link>http://webkit.org/blog/94/amusing/#comment-18240</link>
		<dc:creator>josenintendo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 23:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webkit.org/blog/?p=94#comment-18240</guid>
		<description>The above link takes about 10 seconds to load for me, but then spinning beach ball for about 30-40 before the blue gradient fills the URL entry bar; I'm plugged in AC with a "hi-res" Powerbook G4, 1G ram.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The above link takes about 10 seconds to load for me, but then spinning beach ball for about 30-40 before the blue gradient fills the URL entry bar; I&#8217;m plugged in AC with a &#8220;hi-res&#8221; Powerbook G4, 1G ram.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gavza</title>
		<link>http://webkit.org/blog/94/amusing/#comment-18173</link>
		<dc:creator>gavza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 05:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webkit.org/blog/?p=94#comment-18173</guid>
		<description>Not sure what josenintendo is moaning about.  Tried loading:

http://digg.com/tech_news/Can_you_survive_for_24_hours_without_your_computer

which has a lot of comments, and it took ~8 seconds (Mac Pro), with no spinning beach ball.  With the latest Webkit, it was ~5 seconds.  Could it be faster?  Of course; faster is always better, and Firefox 2 does it in 3-4 seconds.  I hope that Safari in Leopard is faster still, but I'm happy with Safari 99.99% of the time, and I file a bug on the odd occasion when I notice a problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure what josenintendo is moaning about.  Tried loading:</p>
<p><a href="http://digg.com/tech_news/Can_you_survive_for_24_hours_without_your_computer" rel="nofollow">http://digg.com/tech_news/Can_you_survive_for_24_hours_without_your_computer</a></p>
<p>which has a lot of comments, and it took ~8 seconds (Mac Pro), with no spinning beach ball.  With the latest Webkit, it was ~5 seconds.  Could it be faster?  Of course; faster is always better, and Firefox 2 does it in 3-4 seconds.  I hope that Safari in Leopard is faster still, but I&#8217;m happy with Safari 99.99% of the time, and I file a bug on the odd occasion when I notice a problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Around the web &#124; alexking.org</title>
		<link>http://webkit.org/blog/94/amusing/#comment-18147</link>
		<dc:creator>Around the web &#124; alexking.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 20:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webkit.org/blog/?p=94#comment-18147</guid>
		<description>[...]  late &#8217;90&#8217;s mentality. Yahoo! Mail Beta meets Yahoo! Messenger - pretty slick. Amusing - heh. Photo Matt - Advertising and Blogs - kudos to Matt for jumping right in and not having [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  late &#8217;90&#8217;s mentality. Yahoo! Mail Beta meets Yahoo! Messenger - pretty slick. Amusing - heh. Photo Matt - Advertising and Blogs - kudos to Matt for jumping right in and not having [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
