<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Background Music</title>
	<atom:link href="http://webkit.org/blog/96/background-music/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://webkit.org/blog/96/background-music/</link>
	<description>All about WebKit development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:00:28 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Safari performance issues &#124; The Apple Core &#124; ZDNet.com</title>
		<link>http://webkit.org/blog/96/background-music/comment-page-2/#comment-21620</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Safari performance issues &#124; The Apple Core &#124; ZDNet.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 23:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webkit.org/blog/?p=96#comment-21620</guid>
		<description>[...]  around the blogosphere on the &quot;Sluggish Safari&quot; issue including a response from Surfin&#039; Safari&#039;s David Hyatt, one of the engineers responsible for creating and updating Safari: 1) Browsers [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  around the blogosphere on the &quot;Sluggish Safari&quot; issue including a response from Surfin&#39; Safari&#39;s David Hyatt, one of the engineers responsible for creating and updating Safari: 1) Browsers [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drop-Down Menus With Mac OS X Safari and Firefox &#187; kevin barnett</title>
		<link>http://webkit.org/blog/96/background-music/comment-page-2/#comment-19261</link>
		<dc:creator>Drop-Down Menus With Mac OS X Safari and Firefox &#187; kevin barnett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 00:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webkit.org/blog/?p=96#comment-19261</guid>
		<description>[...]  Several bugs exist, performance and otherwise. Apple and the Safari team even admit to an &#8220;archaic Mac plugin framework&#8221; yet we hear nothing from them on plans to address this issue.   One such  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  Several bugs exist, performance and otherwise. Apple and the Safari team even admit to an &#8220;archaic Mac plugin framework&#8221; yet we hear nothing from them on plans to address this issue.   One such  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fliegenklatsche</title>
		<link>http://webkit.org/blog/96/background-music/comment-page-2/#comment-19040</link>
		<dc:creator>fliegenklatsche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2007 09:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webkit.org/blog/?p=96#comment-19040</guid>
		<description>I won’t disagree about the forgetting of tabs upon quit, but there are SIMBL plug-ins that do that, like ForgetMeNot:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I won’t disagree about the forgetting of tabs upon quit, but there are SIMBL plug-ins that do that, like ForgetMeNot:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Music news and much more &#187; Background Music</title>
		<link>http://webkit.org/blog/96/background-music/comment-page-2/#comment-18973</link>
		<dc:creator>Music news and much more &#187; Background Music</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 17:27:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webkit.org/blog/?p=96#comment-18973</guid>
		<description>[...] owser should do when it is the background application is actually &#8230; Original post by hyatt   				  			  			  		  No Comments yet  	&#187;     RSS feed for comments on this post [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] owser should do when it is the background application is actually &#8230; Original post by hyatt  </p>
<p> No Comments yet<br />
 	&raquo;</p>
<p> RSS feed for comments on this post [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sinema</title>
		<link>http://webkit.org/blog/96/background-music/comment-page-2/#comment-18932</link>
		<dc:creator>sinema</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 18:13:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webkit.org/blog/?p=96#comment-18932</guid>
		<description>“The Mac plugin framework is really archaic ” So I understand there is no need to blame Adobe for the performance problems with the Flash plugin. I thought a new type of web plugin, different from Netscape plugins, had been introduced with Mac OS X and/or Safari. Any project to fix this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“The Mac plugin framework is really archaic ” So I understand there is no need to blame Adobe for the performance problems with the Flash plugin. I thought a new type of web plugin, different from Netscape plugins, had been introduced with Mac OS X and/or Safari. Any project to fix this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Rowe</title>
		<link>http://webkit.org/blog/96/background-music/comment-page-2/#comment-18898</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Rowe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 13:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webkit.org/blog/?p=96#comment-18898</guid>
		<description>name99, please try and keep the discussion relevant to the topic at hand and avoid making a technical discussion into a personal one.  What you may interpret as condecension is likely the fact that &lt;em&gt;any user&lt;/em&gt; of a WebKit-based browser may be participating in this conversation, not just those whom are technically inclined.  It&#039;s very difficult to know what level of knowledge to assume when composing a response in a situation such as that.  Simplifications and explanations are provided so that those not intimately familiar with how things work can at least follow along, and to ensure that everyone is on the same page.

- Mark</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>name99, please try and keep the discussion relevant to the topic at hand and avoid making a technical discussion into a personal one.  What you may interpret as condecension is likely the fact that <em>any user</em> of a WebKit-based browser may be participating in this conversation, not just those whom are technically inclined.  It&#8217;s very difficult to know what level of knowledge to assume when composing a response in a situation such as that.  Simplifications and explanations are provided so that those not intimately familiar with how things work can at least follow along, and to ensure that everyone is on the same page.</p>
<p>- Mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: name99</title>
		<link>http://webkit.org/blog/96/background-music/comment-page-2/#comment-18877</link>
		<dc:creator>name99</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 23:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webkit.org/blog/?p=96#comment-18877</guid>
		<description>&quot;
While I have nothing against the idea of Safari being able to run smoothly in perpetuity without restarting, I would question the need to keep your computer running constantly. There are only a finite amount of natural resources - it’s not a bad idea to conserve some when you can.
&quot;

(1) Modern computers have this crazy new invention called &quot;sleeping&quot;. Look into it some time.

(2) Do you have no kids and a vasectomy? I do. If you don&#039;t, then WTF right do you have to tell other people about saving natural resources? Any kids you bring into the world will utilize VASTLY more resources than my sleeping TiBook portable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221;<br />
While I have nothing against the idea of Safari being able to run smoothly in perpetuity without restarting, I would question the need to keep your computer running constantly. There are only a finite amount of natural resources &#8211; it’s not a bad idea to conserve some when you can.<br />
&#8221;</p>
<p>(1) Modern computers have this crazy new invention called &#8220;sleeping&#8221;. Look into it some time.</p>
<p>(2) Do you have no kids and a vasectomy? I do. If you don&#8217;t, then WTF right do you have to tell other people about saving natural resources? Any kids you bring into the world will utilize VASTLY more resources than my sleeping TiBook portable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Rowe</title>
		<link>http://webkit.org/blog/96/background-music/comment-page-2/#comment-18641</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Rowe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 01:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webkit.org/blog/?p=96#comment-18641</guid>
		<description>dilbertfan: Please take a look at the &quot;Keeping in Touch&quot; link in the navigation to the left.  The easiest forum for getting help would be the IRC channel, as this is real-time chat with many of the WebKit developers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dilbertfan: Please take a look at the &#8220;Keeping in Touch&#8221; link in the navigation to the left.  The easiest forum for getting help would be the IRC channel, as this is real-time chat with many of the WebKit developers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dilbertfan</title>
		<link>http://webkit.org/blog/96/background-music/comment-page-2/#comment-18640</link>
		<dc:creator>dilbertfan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 20:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webkit.org/blog/?p=96#comment-18640</guid>
		<description>I know this is the wrong forum.
As a newbie I need help as I am unable to build and run the webkit. Where does one go ?

Thanks in advance</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know this is the wrong forum.<br />
As a newbie I need help as I am unable to build and run the webkit. Where does one go ?</p>
<p>Thanks in advance</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hedrick</title>
		<link>http://webkit.org/blog/96/background-music/comment-page-2/#comment-18639</link>
		<dc:creator>hedrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 18:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webkit.org/blog/?p=96#comment-18639</guid>
		<description>I appreciate all the careful thought to how to handle background processing, but I&#039;d really rather have it off. All the animations I see are ads. It&#039;s bad enough for them to take resources while I&#039;m watching the page. I certainly don&#039;t want them doing it while I&#039;m not.

I&#039;m also getting tired of having Safari slowly degrade in performance, impacting the rest of the system.

I hope I don&#039;t sound negative. I really like Safari. But I&#039;m slowly moving to other browsers because of Safari&#039;s impact on the system, and its insistence on my installing Flash even though I don&#039;t want it. (Yes, I know there are shareware products for this, but my experience is that shareware system tools eventually cause more trouble than they solve.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate all the careful thought to how to handle background processing, but I&#8217;d really rather have it off. All the animations I see are ads. It&#8217;s bad enough for them to take resources while I&#8217;m watching the page. I certainly don&#8217;t want them doing it while I&#8217;m not.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m also getting tired of having Safari slowly degrade in performance, impacting the rest of the system.</p>
<p>I hope I don&#8217;t sound negative. I really like Safari. But I&#8217;m slowly moving to other browsers because of Safari&#8217;s impact on the system, and its insistence on my installing Flash even though I don&#8217;t want it. (Yes, I know there are shareware products for this, but my experience is that shareware system tools eventually cause more trouble than they solve.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
